Slide them to show the best stack. Now the worst stack.

What that answer leaves out

That selects the coincident-miss endpoint.

Excluded world. A world in which the miss sets are disjoint is left out.

That selects an independence model.

Excluded world. A world in which both miss sets coincide is left out.

Keep the set instead of selecting an interior point.

Excluded world. An overlap larger than either miss set is excluded by these marginals.

Adding counts is a union operation without the overlap subtraction.

Excluded world. A world in which the same item belongs to both miss sets is left out.

integer overlap counts; population=100, miss counts=(10,10); readout=overlap/100

Write the nearest claim this example does not support.

Your words stay on this page. Nothing is sent or stored.

exposure. Every coin is on the table and seen by both, so the device silently assumes full exposure — which is exactly why A4 needs D-005.
These are self-audited digital models, not independently verified physical devices.
No learner efficacy, transfer, accessibility equivalence, or vendor performance has been measured.
Unbounded and temporal devices remain text exercises; no faithful state machine is asserted for them.
The receipt exercise has no supplied totals or ceiling, so it supports no computed denominator here.
The digital model is the finite integer overlap grid, not every real-valued probability in the continuous interval.

Look away from the object, then answer the question again. This is a prompt for reflection, not a measured learning outcome.

Do the miss rates tell you how to stack the misses?