Wire it so it is safer.

What that answer leaves out

Counting hasps does not specify how they compose.

Excluded world. A box that opens when either hasp opens is left out.

Blocking and availability can call for different rules.

Excluded world. A box evaluated under a different opening rule is excluded from this comparison.

That selects conjunction before naming the objective.

Excluded world. A box intended to open when either hasp opens is left out.

That selects disjunction before naming the objective.

Excluded world. A box intended to require both hasps is left out.

named composition rules only; no rates or routing order

Write the nearest claim this example does not support.

Your words stay on this page. Nothing is sent or stored.

any rate, and nothing about routing order
These are self-audited digital models, not independently verified physical devices.
No learner efficacy, transfer, accessibility equivalence, or vendor performance has been measured.
Unbounded and temporal devices remain text exercises; no faithful state machine is asserted for them.
The receipt exercise has no supplied totals or ceiling, so it supports no computed denominator here.

Look away from the object, then answer the question again. This is a prompt for reflection, not a measured learning outcome.

What has to be named before “safer” has a meaning?