Essays, field notes, and audit logs. Where a piece makes a technical claim, it carries the claim's envelope and the ledger carries its binding; where it doesn't, it says so. The audit logs document this site's own failures — they are the most load-bearing pieces here.
Two guardrails each fail ten percent of the time. Independence says the stack fails one percent; the evidence supports an interval ten times that wide — computed, witnessed at both endpoints, and re-reproduced from a clean clone by CI.
Read →The v0.4 record, rated across eight dimensions without anesthesia — and a lookback contract whose most unflattering conclusion is pre-registered so it cannot be dodged in a month.
Read →A visually coherent evidence system can produce the impression of rigor even where the claim–support mapping is stale. Five places this site asserted mechanics it did not have, the machinery that closed them, and what still isn't closed.
Read →Six questions under one epistemic grammar — marginals, pairwise evidence, receipt kernels, the attestation boundary, claim expiry, witnesses. Generated from the registry, so their status lines cannot drift from the ledger's.
Browse →